Over the river and through the woods

I'm good with colors.

In the spirit of the season, on Christmas Eve I took homemade cookies to some of our major donors. I called everyone before hand to make sure they would be home for the holidays. Some had forgotten that I was coming, so it was a pleasant surprise. Everyone was gracious and invited me into their homes. A few had family visiting, or were expecting company that evening. One couple was celebrating Hannukah. Many of them were spending a quiet weekend at home, waiting until warmer months to visit grown children and special grandchildren (and a few great grands, thrown in for good measure!). A few visits weren't much more than a step inside and a quick update on programming and reiteration how much they enjoyed the artistic product.

But most were so much more. One was brainstorming about people I need to contact and partnerships I should check out. One was learning much more past journeys and long-nurtured friendships. One was with a couple who'd just celebrated their 65th anniversary and one was with a recent widow who was spending her first holiday alone. Every one--without exception--was delightful and a learning experience for me.

This is what I do: develop relationships. I connect with people on an individual level, find out about them, what their interests are, who they see themselves as. Not because I have to (no one is requiring it of me), or because I should (studies routinely show donors give money to people, not causes), but because I want to. My main complaint is that I don't have more time to connect with people. Why do I ask my volunteers to come early? Not because there's that much work to do (normally), but because it gives me a chance to catch up with them before the onslaught of audience. Why do we still have letter-stuffing parties, when having the printer automatically stuff and label would be easier (although more expensive)? Because it lets all the volunteers comes together and visit.

What makes live theater so special, so intrinsic to a better community? Because it brings people together and lets them know a bit about each other a little better.

Comments

High Art vs Low Art

“The masses seek distraction whereas art demands concentration from the spectator.” - -The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin, 1936 Is there any more contentious question in the art world than the concept of “high” versus “low” I like venn diagrams. And shouldn't art really be in the middle? art? Who gets to judge? What are the parameters in which to judge? There is no standard definition for either concept and personal explanations range from simple to incredibly complex. One common theory about how to explain the difference is high art is “popular” and low art is “unpopular”, that is, appealing (or not) to many people. This also links to another version of the difference: that high art fosters the widest connection between people while a smaller subsection enjoys low art. This is in direct contradiction, though, to the idea of low art being part of mass culture (raising yet another question of “is art culture” or merely a com...

Pass the Collection Plate, Please.

Various sizes of buildings, with some sort of seating arranged in rows, facing a slightly raised platform. may have curtains around the platform. people --primarily men-- take the platform to orate to the audience seated before them. A plea for donations is made at some point, either before or after the show, which may have music and will definitely have directives masked as stories on how to be a human in this day-and-age. children will be seen, maybe, but definitely not heard. the men in charge will believe they have been given a special gift for leading this particular group of people. and the people, for whatever reason, will also believe this. and this group of people will believe that their building and person and each other are completely different and somehow better than all the other exact same groups around their town/city/county/state/nation. If theater wants to be treated as church and church as theater, then both are getting exactly what they have been setting up for the p...

Death & The Theater

I was listening to a recent episode of the Tim Ferris podcast and the guest, happiness scholar Arthur C. Brooks, was discussing death meditations. And the little lightbulb in my brain turned on with the thought, "We need to talk more about death in theaters." I know, I know, that seems like an illogical statement because it feels like we're always talking about the death of theater. This whole summer has been filled with articles and op-eds from across the country about how large regional theaters are dying in major cities. But that's not the kind of death Brooks was talking about, and in reality, it isn't death these articles are complaining about, either: they are trying to stay alive in a “E’s just resting” fashion, to find some kind of life-support for the theaters, to keep them going, receive new money from new audiences or donors, new shows, new gimmicks to draw more or different people in the door. Anything to keep from dying. We don't talk about death...

Perpetually Curious

Search This Blog