Skip to main content

Old School AND not VERSUS New School: Happy Together at Americans for the Arts Convention

Upon checking in at Pittsburgh, participants were given a tote bag full of goodies, including a real paper notebook and a real wood-encased pen. I was pleasantly surprised, as I always feel like the only person in the room not using a laptop to take notes. At our first Emerging Leaders preconference session (with the incomparable Margie Reese and Maryo Ewell explaining our place in the history of community arts), I saw many more attendees using the notebooks provided or--like me--had brought their own pads/paper/writing implements to use.
afta13 notes
Worlds collide.

Being (mostly) Millenials, we also proceeded to pull out our smart phones to tweet the conference session. Folks would jot a note, then tweet the next profound statement, comfortable switching between both written forms. During networking sessions, we exchanged paper business cards, then went and connected with each other on LinkedIn.

Throughout the conference, this happy mingling of traditional and newfangled continued. A session presenter would tweet questions before the session, then use a magic marker and easel pad to write audience response. Prezi presentations with modern graphic imagery gave way to colored beads in a jar showing the importance of diversity within organizations.

Sessions themselves free-wheeled from "using social media to engage your audience" to "how to make sure your business model works for you." The pinnacle of the dichotomy was the opening reception outside the Warhol Museum: pioneer pop art paired with old-world, potato-filled pierogies. Perfectly coexisting (and perfectly delicious!)

In this day of always-on social networks making it possible for this emerging leader in rural North Carolina to have regular conversations with service organization executive directors in California or cutting edge arts researchers in New York City, a national conference is almost approaching old-school itself. And yet, they are both necessary and meld quite well. Most of the people I tweet with I would never have the opportunity to meet IRL (In Real Life, for those not up on the lingo) if not for the AftA convention. Words may be perfectly meted and research vetted in a blog post that may itself get lots of interaction, but the idea and energy exchange--even using the same words and research--is more electric when participants are in the same room. It's one thing to debate what and why diversity means from the comfort of your couch, quite another to be seated next to someone visibly different (or not, which is an added layer of discussion). Especially moving are the real-time conference emotional breakthroughs--the profound aha's that may even lead to tears--that are shared between attendees. Meeting idols, making new friends, strengthening bonds, putting faces and handshakes to blog headshots and Twitter handles, all of these are possible only because both of these methods of communing exist.

I often say "it's about building relationships." It's what I do--what we all do, really, with our audiences. Yes, through the art, but isn't that what all the administrative stuff boils down to, too? Asking for donations: relationships. More attendance: relationships. Understanding diverse perspectives: relationships. Advocating for the arts: relationships.

The AftA 2013 conference highlighted for me that the core of our work is building relationships and we should embrace and use ALL the different ways to do that. There are times and places for everything, from cutting edge Vine videos to classic deal-making golf games. There is no magic technology that will solve our problems, no mystical language of lunches that will correct our flaws. All there is is connection. And we should strive for just that, every day.

Comments

  1. Thanks so much for your insights, Devra, especially about the ways we switch back and forth between our various means of communication and connection. I couldn't agree more with your observations about building relationships in so many different ways. I've also noticed over the years that the AFTA conventions give me an opportunity for human connections to long-term as well as new friends in the field. Regardless of what I know about them from FB and Twitter, seeing them, talking, sharing hugs is a way of reminding myself that we have all had our ups and downs -- and we are still standing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed! I had met several people last year in San Antonio and Charlotte and it was nice to catch up on their lives, too. And who would want to miss out on sharing one of your hugs?!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Year, New You Vision Board

VISION BOARDS! Let's get a couple of things clear, right at the start. THERE IS NO WRONG WAY TO MAKE A VISION BOARD. THIS IS NOT SCIENCE. You believe that putting pieces of pretty paper on another piece of paper calls into your life your deepest hopes and dreams, then you believe it with all your heart and soul. These are inspirational devices, not architectural blueprints. Ok, now that we have some caveats taken care of, the briefest of background before we get to the supplies and instructions (OH MY GOD THIS IS WHY THE ONLINE RECIPE BLOGS ARE LIKE THIS) I've been making vision boards consistently every year for my birthday (ish, usually on the new moon closest to my actual natal day) for a decade and before that on and off since college. I've always considered paper art as my chosen visual artistic medium, so vision boards were right up my manifestation alley. At one point in my life I wanted to work in magazine publishing (scratch that, I still do) so buying and keeping...

High Art vs Low Art

“The masses seek distraction whereas art demands concentration from the spectator.” - -The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin, 1936 Is there any more contentious question in the art world than the concept of “high” versus “low” I like venn diagrams. And shouldn't art really be in the middle?  art? Who gets to judge? What are the parameters in which to judge? There is no standard definition for either concept and personal explanations range from simple to incredibly complex. One common theory about how to explain the difference is high art is “popular” and low art is “unpopular”, that is, appealing (or not) to many people. This also links to another version of the difference: that high art fosters the widest connection between people while a smaller subsection enjoys low art. This is in direct contradiction, though, to the idea of low art being part of mass culture (raising yet another question of “is art culture” or merely a com...

Theater in the Age of Netflix

I read a great article in the December issue of Fast Company titled " Retail in the Age of Amazon. " Long-time readers know of my penchant for following retail conversations and seeing how they are applicable to the theater world and this article was no different. (New readers: hello! do you think retail and theater overlap, too?) I sat down to write notes on all the topics and details from the article that I wanted to flesh out on for theaters. I thought it would be 4 or 5, since the article itself had 4 sections to it. Instead, I had TWENTY-TWO points to hit. To flesh out each of those points, even a paragraph a piece, seems a tad much for a blog post. Some of them I've written about before, like defining success on your terms and using heretical ideas . A lot of them are about how going back to basics and focusing on differentiation rather than competing at the same game can help retail businesses survive and thrive in the age of click-and-buy. This is...