Skip to main content

Is your theater building a community? Or is it just putting on shows?

slide with text "a thriving arts sector creates suprising ripple benefits throughout our community"

I asked in a Facebook post in 2011: "Theater is about connections. How do administrators facilitate this connecting? How do theaters (as an entity) ensure this connection continues happening, time and time again?" Strengthening these connections is what makes a theater resilient, what makes the theater ecosystem resilient. 

Even before Covid forced theater closures, our local ecosystem lost several long-standing organizations due to life happening (people moved, people aged and retired, etc.). Add the normal ebb and flow of creatives coming together for some number of shows and then going on to reassemble in different configurations. New groups crop up, some grow, some provide fodder for a completely different way of making art. 

Nonprofit theater cannot build itself in the same way as for-profit theater. The very heart of the nonprofit mission is community-mindedness. For-profit theater by its very nature will follow a path of least resistance to earning as much profit as it can: mass-audience pleasing work; stunt casting; paying actors, designers, and crew as little as possible. Nonprofit theaters that use the same tactics repeatedly abandon their core reason for being a nonprofit: to strengthen their community. 

Much like a forest must withstand a fire every so often in order to clear out decay and make room for new growth, the past few years should be viewed similarly for our local theater ecosystem. Has it been painful? Sure. Has it been drastic? In some ways, yes. 

Can we now look around and ask ourselves "how are we resilient, how do we move forward and build organizations that are more focused on the community and supporting the artists within?" Now is exactly the time to do that. Zingerman's president Ari Weinzweig recently wrote "Perhaps most of all, we can create organizational ecosystems where resilience is present and persistent in the best possible ways." 

  • Boards need to be changed to resemble the community the organization serves. 
  • Administrations need to diversify in nonprofit the same way Fortune 500 companies need to have more diverse staffs throughout their "pipeline." 
  • Work presented needs to reflect the conversations the community must have. 
  • Actors need to be advocates and admin needs to get off the wall of "well we've never done that before" and make safe, supportive working spaces for all. 
  • And audiences have to show up for all the work. All. 

For our theaters, resilience isn't putting on another show or having an endowment or even a few donors with very deep pockets (although all those things help). Resilience is building a community both inside and outside the doors that wants to ensure the art continues to make a difference. 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Year, New You Vision Board

VISION BOARDS! Let's get a couple of things clear, right at the start. THERE IS NO WRONG WAY TO MAKE A VISION BOARD. THIS IS NOT SCIENCE. You believe that putting pieces of pretty paper on another piece of paper calls into your life your deepest hopes and dreams, then you believe it with all your heart and soul. These are inspirational devices, not architectural blueprints. Ok, now that we have some caveats taken care of, the briefest of background before we get to the supplies and instructions (OH MY GOD THIS IS WHY THE ONLINE RECIPE BLOGS ARE LIKE THIS) I've been making vision boards consistently every year for my birthday (ish, usually on the new moon closest to my actual natal day) for a decade and before that on and off since college. I've always considered paper art as my chosen visual artistic medium, so vision boards were right up my manifestation alley. At one point in my life I wanted to work in magazine publishing (scratch that, I still do) so buying and keeping...
Post a Comment
Read more

High Art vs Low Art

“The masses seek distraction whereas art demands concentration from the spectator.” - -The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin, 1936 Is there any more contentious question in the art world than the concept of “high” versus “low” I like venn diagrams. And shouldn't art really be in the middle?  art? Who gets to judge? What are the parameters in which to judge? There is no standard definition for either concept and personal explanations range from simple to incredibly complex. One common theory about how to explain the difference is high art is “popular” and low art is “unpopular”, that is, appealing (or not) to many people. This also links to another version of the difference: that high art fosters the widest connection between people while a smaller subsection enjoys low art. This is in direct contradiction, though, to the idea of low art being part of mass culture (raising yet another question of “is art culture” or merely a com...
Post a Comment
Read more

NaBloPoMo Day 3: Giveaway!

Seriously! At the end of this month, one lucky commenter will receive one of the following: 1. A free stakeholder service checkup from yours truly! This will be my combo package: examining your theater's customer service points with both outside patrons and internal employees and members. (This combo will be priced at $400, fyi.) 2. A season pass to Common Ground Theatre. That's right: 2 tickets to any show every month for the entire year. ($300-400 value) 3. "My favorite books " package: a copy of each of my favorite leadership/arts books. More on these in tomorrow's post. There you have it! Leave a cogent comment on as many of these posts as move you, and you could be the lucky winner of one of these amazing (if I do say so myself) packages!
2 comments
Read more