Skip to main content

"Success does not have to be solemn"

I'm starting a new theme, of posts about where I see cross-industry applicability. While I'm passionate about the performing arts, I take inspiration from everywhere. 

In high school I wanted to go into magazine publishing because I adored the medium. I've always been a sucker for a good article, especially one with beautiful photography to go along with it. So I was pleasantly surprised by this New York Times video about British handbag designer Anya Hindmarch. Done as interview with writer Suzy Menkes, this short video captured my attention, and also held some nuggets that I think apply to theaters as well. 

copyright NYTimes

Menkes describes Hindmarch's bags as "women-friendly, with an attention to detail and lots of fun." Shouldn't that be theater? We all know the statistic that 67% of Broadway theater audiences are female, and I'm sure that holds true across nonprofit and non-New York markets, as well. Are we finding ways to make our theaters friendly to who is really in our audience? Are we paying attention to all the details of a patron's experience, or just lip service to what happens outside of the stage area? How do we make the experience fun? Two of the National Arts Marketing Project Conference sessions last week were on ways to make the rest of the patron's visit a fun and engaging experience (Augmented Reality and Activating Spaces, for those who want to check the tweets). I can't wait to see what those attendees come up with and share with their audiences! 

"You're the only bag designer to put on a fashion show," Menkes says to Hindmarch. She remarks that she's trying to give "context" to the handbags themselves. A handbag is meant to be used, of course, and designer bags are made to be SEEN, not just seen. I want to propose taking a slightly different read on this, though, for theater: what's the unexpected for us? If our product is a staged production, what is a way we can re-contextualize that in order to either reach a different audience or to delight the one we currently have? Or take Hindmarch's "I'm not a plastic bag" tote. It has that balance of being quirky, without being unapproachable, of being funny, but still within the context of her product world. Doing something different in theater shouldn't be so out of the world that audiences can't grasp what you're doing. It should be just different enough to capture their attention. 

"I've built [my stores] by hiring amazing craftsmen who make things you want to wear." Hindmarch responds to a query about how she's grown the business over the past 25 years. Replace "wear" with "experience" and shouldn't we have theater's mantra? Let's hire amazing craftsmen--the most talented artists we can afford--and let them make things we want to experience. Guthrie, Papp, Fichandler, all had the long-term vision to know this was the way you produce great art. Be passionate about your customer. Make things they want to wear. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Year, New You Vision Board

VISION BOARDS! Let's get a couple of things clear, right at the start. THERE IS NO WRONG WAY TO MAKE A VISION BOARD. THIS IS NOT SCIENCE. You believe that putting pieces of pretty paper on another piece of paper calls into your life your deepest hopes and dreams, then you believe it with all your heart and soul. These are inspirational devices, not architectural blueprints. Ok, now that we have some caveats taken care of, the briefest of background before we get to the supplies and instructions (OH MY GOD THIS IS WHY THE ONLINE RECIPE BLOGS ARE LIKE THIS) I've been making vision boards consistently every year for my birthday (ish, usually on the new moon closest to my actual natal day) for a decade and before that on and off since college. I've always considered paper art as my chosen visual artistic medium, so vision boards were right up my manifestation alley. At one point in my life I wanted to work in magazine publishing (scratch that, I still do) so buying and keeping...
Post a Comment
Read more

High Art vs Low Art

“The masses seek distraction whereas art demands concentration from the spectator.” - -The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin, 1936 Is there any more contentious question in the art world than the concept of “high” versus “low” I like venn diagrams. And shouldn't art really be in the middle?  art? Who gets to judge? What are the parameters in which to judge? There is no standard definition for either concept and personal explanations range from simple to incredibly complex. One common theory about how to explain the difference is high art is “popular” and low art is “unpopular”, that is, appealing (or not) to many people. This also links to another version of the difference: that high art fosters the widest connection between people while a smaller subsection enjoys low art. This is in direct contradiction, though, to the idea of low art being part of mass culture (raising yet another question of “is art culture” or merely a com...
Post a Comment
Read more

Theater in the Age of Netflix

I read a great article in the December issue of Fast Company titled " Retail in the Age of Amazon. " Long-time readers know of my penchant for following retail conversations and seeing how they are applicable to the theater world and this article was no different. (New readers: hello! do you think retail and theater overlap, too?) I sat down to write notes on all the topics and details from the article that I wanted to flesh out on for theaters. I thought it would be 4 or 5, since the article itself had 4 sections to it. Instead, I had TWENTY-TWO points to hit. To flesh out each of those points, even a paragraph a piece, seems a tad much for a blog post. Some of them I've written about before, like defining success on your terms and using heretical ideas . A lot of them are about how going back to basics and focusing on differentiation rather than competing at the same game can help retail businesses survive and thrive in the age of click-and-buy. This is...
2 comments
Read more