Skip to main content

Old School AND not VERSUS New School: Happy Together at Americans for the Arts Convention

Upon checking in at Pittsburgh, participants were given a tote bag full of goodies, including a real paper notebook and a real wood-encased pen. I was pleasantly surprised, as I always feel like the only person in the room not using a laptop to take notes. At our first Emerging Leaders preconference session (with the incomparable Margie Reese and Maryo Ewell explaining our place in the history of community arts), I saw many more attendees using the notebooks provided or--like me--had brought their own pads/paper/writing implements to use.
afta13 notes
Worlds collide.

Being (mostly) Millenials, we also proceeded to pull out our smart phones to tweet the conference session. Folks would jot a note, then tweet the next profound statement, comfortable switching between both written forms. During networking sessions, we exchanged paper business cards, then went and connected with each other on LinkedIn.

Throughout the conference, this happy mingling of traditional and newfangled continued. A session presenter would tweet questions before the session, then use a magic marker and easel pad to write audience response. Prezi presentations with modern graphic imagery gave way to colored beads in a jar showing the importance of diversity within organizations.

Sessions themselves free-wheeled from "using social media to engage your audience" to "how to make sure your business model works for you." The pinnacle of the dichotomy was the opening reception outside the Warhol Museum: pioneer pop art paired with old-world, potato-filled pierogies. Perfectly coexisting (and perfectly delicious!)

In this day of always-on social networks making it possible for this emerging leader in rural North Carolina to have regular conversations with service organization executive directors in California or cutting edge arts researchers in New York City, a national conference is almost approaching old-school itself. And yet, they are both necessary and meld quite well. Most of the people I tweet with I would never have the opportunity to meet IRL (In Real Life, for those not up on the lingo) if not for the AftA convention. Words may be perfectly meted and research vetted in a blog post that may itself get lots of interaction, but the idea and energy exchange--even using the same words and research--is more electric when participants are in the same room. It's one thing to debate what and why diversity means from the comfort of your couch, quite another to be seated next to someone visibly different (or not, which is an added layer of discussion). Especially moving are the real-time conference emotional breakthroughs--the profound aha's that may even lead to tears--that are shared between attendees. Meeting idols, making new friends, strengthening bonds, putting faces and handshakes to blog headshots and Twitter handles, all of these are possible only because both of these methods of communing exist.

I often say "it's about building relationships." It's what I do--what we all do, really, with our audiences. Yes, through the art, but isn't that what all the administrative stuff boils down to, too? Asking for donations: relationships. More attendance: relationships. Understanding diverse perspectives: relationships. Advocating for the arts: relationships.

The AftA 2013 conference highlighted for me that the core of our work is building relationships and we should embrace and use ALL the different ways to do that. There are times and places for everything, from cutting edge Vine videos to classic deal-making golf games. There is no magic technology that will solve our problems, no mystical language of lunches that will correct our flaws. All there is is connection. And we should strive for just that, every day.

Comments

  1. Thanks so much for your insights, Devra, especially about the ways we switch back and forth between our various means of communication and connection. I couldn't agree more with your observations about building relationships in so many different ways. I've also noticed over the years that the AFTA conventions give me an opportunity for human connections to long-term as well as new friends in the field. Regardless of what I know about them from FB and Twitter, seeing them, talking, sharing hugs is a way of reminding myself that we have all had our ups and downs -- and we are still standing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed! I had met several people last year in San Antonio and Charlotte and it was nice to catch up on their lives, too. And who would want to miss out on sharing one of your hugs?!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

High Art vs Low Art

“The masses seek distraction whereas art demands concentration from the spectator.” - -The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin, 1936 Is there any more contentious question in the art world than the concept of “high” versus “low” I like venn diagrams. And shouldn't art really be in the middle?  art? Who gets to judge? What are the parameters in which to judge? There is no standard definition for either concept and personal explanations range from simple to incredibly complex. One common theory about how to explain the difference is high art is “popular” and low art is “unpopular”, that is, appealing (or not) to many people. This also links to another version of the difference: that high art fosters the widest connection between people while a smaller subsection enjoys low art. This is in direct contradiction, though, to the idea of low art being part of mass culture (raising yet another question of “is art culture” or merely a com

Death & The Theater

I was listening to a recent episode of the Tim Ferris podcast and the guest, happiness scholar Arthur C. Brooks, was discussing death meditations. And the little lightbulb in my brain turned on with the thought, "We need to talk more about death in theaters." I know, I know, that seems like an illogical statement because it feels like we're always talking about the death of theater. This whole summer has been filled with articles and op-eds from across the country about how large regional theaters are dying in major cities. But that's not the kind of death Brooks was talking about, and in reality, it isn't death these articles are complaining about, either: they are trying to stay alive in a “E’s just resting” fashion, to find some kind of life-support for the theaters, to keep them going, receive new money from new audiences or donors, new shows, new gimmicks to draw more or different people in the door. Anything to keep from dying. We don't talk about death

Pass the Collection Plate, Please.

Various sizes of buildings, with some sort of seating arranged in rows, facing a slightly raised platform. may have curtains around the platform. people --primarily men-- take the platform to orate to the audience seated before them. A plea for donations is made at some point, either before or after the show, which may have music and will definitely have directives masked as stories on how to be a human in this day-and-age. children will be seen, maybe, but definitely not heard. the men in charge will believe they have been given a special gift for leading this particular group of people. and the people, for whatever reason, will also believe this. and this group of people will believe that their building and person and each other are completely different and somehow better than all the other exact same groups around their town/city/county/state/nation. If theater wants to be treated as church and church as theater, then both are getting exactly what they have been setting up for the p