Skip to main content

Mr. Diplomat and me: Improv Rules!

Is laughing with people about yourself the same as being laughed at? On Nov 22, I was the special guest for Mr. Diplomat, an improv show held every Friday night at DSI Comedy Theater. The show's set-up is a special guest comes on, tells stories from his or her life, and then the crack improv team makes up scenes based on those stories.
"And yes I said yes" by It's Greg, licensed under Creative Commons


I was asked to be the guest in a rather informal way: the guy who took my old job is also on the Diplomat team and they'd had a guest back out, so he asked if I was interested. While I may not have any desire to be an actress, that doesn't mean I don't enjoy my time on stage, so I said, "Yeah, sure, I'm down with that." Kit promised I didn't have to be funny, I just had to get up on stage and tell some stories. They would take care of the rest.

Having recently listened to Daniel Pink's To Sell Is Human, two of the primary rules of improv were already on my mind: "Accept all offers" and "Make your partner look good." The first one is commonly abbreviated "Yes, and"; it means you cannot negate what someone else has said. You must accept the detail or suggestion they've offered and build on that for the scene. It's harder than it sounds. The second one is, too. Being a good improvisation artist is very different than being a stand-up comic, who only has one person on stage to worry about, but it is also very different than being in a legit play, because there you typically have a script that you've (hopefully) read in advance. In improv, you have no idea what the other person is going to say. You must trust your partner, that they are performing under the same rule as you: you're going to make them look good.

These two axioms are applicable in the straight theater world as well (I hate that term, but lack anything better at the moment) and I think they are woefully underused. One hopes that a director will trust her actors enough to let them make some character choices on their own. One hopes that designers say "yes and" when a director proposes a specific element.

One also hopes that an organization will say "Yes and" when an audience member makes a suggestion for the lobby or a play they'd like to see.
Or tries to make donors look good when planning fundraising appeals.
Or accepts offers from potential collaborators or business partners.

It's very seductive to fall into established patterns for how an organization should interact with customers. I will readily admit that when I was training Kit, even though I repeatedly said "Find your own way to do this, as mine may not work for you", I still had to bite my tongue when he made changes to things I'd done for years. I found myself saying "Yes and" under my breath almost every day. I trusted that he was making these changes to make the organization look good (and they did, everyone raved, which then made me pout a little, but that's neither here nor there).

Small nonprofit theater doesn't have the luxury of bundles of money to throw away on failed attempts. So what we need is a lot of trust, that by truthfully telling our stories, accepting all offers, and making sure our partners look good, we will make art that is meaningful and build audiences that appreciate that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

High Art vs Low Art

“The masses seek distraction whereas art demands concentration from the spectator.” - -The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, Walter Benjamin, 1936 Is there any more contentious question in the art world than the concept of “high” versus “low” I like venn diagrams. And shouldn't art really be in the middle?  art? Who gets to judge? What are the parameters in which to judge? There is no standard definition for either concept and personal explanations range from simple to incredibly complex. One common theory about how to explain the difference is high art is “popular” and low art is “unpopular”, that is, appealing (or not) to many people. This also links to another version of the difference: that high art fosters the widest connection between people while a smaller subsection enjoys low art. This is in direct contradiction, though, to the idea of low art being part of mass culture (raising yet another question of “is art culture” or merely a com

Death & The Theater

I was listening to a recent episode of the Tim Ferris podcast and the guest, happiness scholar Arthur C. Brooks, was discussing death meditations. And the little lightbulb in my brain turned on with the thought, "We need to talk more about death in theaters." I know, I know, that seems like an illogical statement because it feels like we're always talking about the death of theater. This whole summer has been filled with articles and op-eds from across the country about how large regional theaters are dying in major cities. But that's not the kind of death Brooks was talking about, and in reality, it isn't death these articles are complaining about, either: they are trying to stay alive in a “E’s just resting” fashion, to find some kind of life-support for the theaters, to keep them going, receive new money from new audiences or donors, new shows, new gimmicks to draw more or different people in the door. Anything to keep from dying. We don't talk about death

Pass the Collection Plate, Please.

Various sizes of buildings, with some sort of seating arranged in rows, facing a slightly raised platform. may have curtains around the platform. people --primarily men-- take the platform to orate to the audience seated before them. A plea for donations is made at some point, either before or after the show, which may have music and will definitely have directives masked as stories on how to be a human in this day-and-age. children will be seen, maybe, but definitely not heard. the men in charge will believe they have been given a special gift for leading this particular group of people. and the people, for whatever reason, will also believe this. and this group of people will believe that their building and person and each other are completely different and somehow better than all the other exact same groups around their town/city/county/state/nation. If theater wants to be treated as church and church as theater, then both are getting exactly what they have been setting up for the p